As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from

Photograph company refuses to return copyright to photographer, claims journalists haven’t got copyright safety: Digital Pictures Evaluation

Do photographers personal the rights to their photos? That is the query on the heart of a authorized battle between photographer Francisco Leong and his former employer, Agence France-Press (AFP).

Leong, a Lisbon, Portugal-based photojournalist, had labored below contract for AFP. He first joined AFP in 2005 as a stringer and have become a employees photographer in 2010 earlier than leaving the company in 2019. The company in France claims that it owns Leong’s photos.

Nevertheless, Portugal’s Journalist Statute and Code of Copyright seem to offer final rights to journalistic work created throughout employment to the unique creator. Leong told Press Gazette that ‘It’s a rule that stands above any particular person contract and states that the copyright belongs to a journalist, interval… on my contract with AFP there was a clause saying the copyright was for AFP. I consider this violates the legislation and due to this fact is null and void.’

The AFP’s protection goes past the contract Leong signed. In keeping with Leong’s union, Sindicato dos Journalistas (SJ) in Portugal, AFP can be arguing that it distributes information inside the public area and that what it publishes would not deserve safety below copyright legislation, because it constitutes ‘mere autos that broadcast to the general public the set of information that painting a selected each day occasion or information.’ SJ argues that AFP’s protection may very well be a ‘scorched-earth coverage’ and that it threatens the livelihoods of reports photographers and company journalists if AFP wins in a European Union (EU) courtroom.

{A photograph} displaying AFP’s headquarters in Paris, used below CC BY-SA 4.0

AFP goes even additional, arguing that ‘mere information or pictures that merely report information occasions will not be inventive, don’t possess originality, and, as such, don’t deserve authorized safety.’ SJ believes this argument may pose a real menace to information companies in Europe, together with AFP, to cost shoppers for photojournalism and journalism at giant.

The SJ mentioned, ‘…if the courtroom guidelines in favor of AFP on this level, the enterprise mannequin of all information companies shall be put in danger, and thus the roles of 1000’s of journalists. That’s as a result of if journalists lose safety over their work as it isn’t eligible for cover, logically their employers can’t declare safety over it both.’

Curiously, regardless of its public area argument, an AFP spokesperson advised Press Gazette that ‘Francisco Leong’s photographs will not be within the public area as a result of the rights belong to AFP, no matter whether or not they’re topic to copyright below Portuguese legislation.’

Additionally at situation within the case is how AFP treats journalists and photographers who aren’t French. AFP would not acknowledge copyright for non-French journalists and photographers. The SJ has requested the Worldwide Federation of Journalists and the European Federation of Journalists for assist, stating that AFP discriminates towards non-French employees. AFP mentioned, ‘The chance is that journalists in all places will get burned. We urge our fellow unions to make their members conscious of this case and be ready to defend our financial rights to our journalistic works.’

Leong will not be asking for financial compensation from AFP however needs the rights to his photos. Leong advised Press Gazette:

‘I’m claiming my copyright as a result of AFP held my footage after [I left] as a substitute of sharing the income with me similar because the French photographers and protecting the cash for themselves… I need justice […] AFP line of protection is so absurd, so egocentric, so short-sighted, that it is laborious to consider.’

Leong has requested Lisbon’s Labor Court docket to intervene within the courtroom case earlier than AFP’s protection is heard. As of now, the listening to has been delayed till October 6.

This case seems to have implications past Leong’s copyright possession. If an EU courtroom guidelines in favor of AFP, the end result may undermine photojournalists’ rights all through Europe. The end result may additionally hurt the flexibility of photographers and companies alike to demand compensation for various kinds of information and images. Once more, AFP argues that information or pictures that report information occasions aren’t inventive and authentic and don’t deserve authorized safety. AFP seems to be arguing each that it owns Leong’s photos and that Leong’s photos do not deserve copyright safety within the first place. These are vital claims.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart