As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from

There may be just one: why is not the EOS R3 an EOS R1?: Digital Pictures Overview

One thing is starting to make me suppose Canon intends the EOS R3 to be a full-on professional sports activities digicam.

Time has a behavior of eroding certainty like the ocean lapping on the foreshore; one thing like that, anyway. The purpose being that opinions and predictions have a horrible behavior of being rendered outdated, and even downright ridiculous, by occasions. Which is my roundabout method of claiming that I am having second ideas concerning the EOS R3.

When Canon first introduced its growth, I opined that it was going to be an intermediate mannequin between the EOS R5 and a forthcoming EOS R1, simply because the EOS 3 had been, again within the colloidal swamp of the movie period. However the latest droplet of attention-sustaining PR from Canon about its forthcoming mannequin has left me questioning: would possibly I’ve been… how can I say this? Unsuitable?

Making one thing from the newest morsels

The most recent tranche of specs launched by Canon makes the EOS R3 look rather more like a mirrorless EOS-1D sequence digicam than I would beforehand assumed, based mostly on the unique announcement. Canon had already revealed that the R3 will exceed the 1D X Mark III’s most burst fee, however the mannequin title and speak of eye-directed AF (a function I would not assume to be pro-ready in its first iteration) made me conclude that the brand new digicam could be designed for high-end customers, however not essentially able to change into the default alternative of probably the most demanding sideline sports activities shooters.

The affirmation of 1D X III-style Good Controllers within the EOS R3 could not have been as eye-catching because the promised Eye Monitoring AF system, but it surely suggests the R3 will attempt to match the DSLR’s velocity of AF level management

However Canon’s announcement that the R3 will have an Ethernet port and a bunch of wired and wi-fi technique of sending photos shortly from the digicam makes me query my assumptions. The availability of the smart controllers, beforehand seen on the 1D X Mark III, however not the extra lowly EOS R5 additionally level in direction of the R3 being extra pro-focused. And, maybe as a result of I spend far an excessive amount of of my life serious about these items, the usage of the identical LP-E19 battery as utilized by the 1D sequence tells me that Canon expects the R3 to sit down alongside 1D X cameras: not simply because a big battery suggests a excessive degree of endurance or dependability, but in addition as a result of it’s going to lend the R3 cross-compatibility for folks already utilizing LP-E19s.

So why is not it referred to as the EOS R1?

If, because it seems, the R3 goes to be a digicam that goals to do just about all the things a 1D X III can do, why is not Canon simply calling it the EOS R1? To my thoughts there are three prospects:

Principle #1: The EOS-1D X III remains to be too new

The EOS-1D X Mark III hasn’t but had its probability to shine. Canon has traditionally launched its top-end sports activities cameras simply earlier than the Olympic Video games, with the expectation that they will be the first software of photographers protecting the occasion. However, with the 2020 Tokyo video games nonetheless but to happen, the EOS-1D X III is a digicam that hasn’t but had its day within the solar. The R3’s growth may have continued, regardless of the delay to the sporting calendar, and therefore it is arrived earlier than 1D X III patrons have had an opportunity to make good use of their investments.

That is most likely the idea I am least satisfied by, however there’s at all times been an implicit compact between Canon and the professionals and companies that purchase 1 sequence cameras: that they will make the funding with some confidence that it will not get replaced or usurped for a number of years. Introducing a ‘mirrorless 1 sequence’ earlier than most 1D X III patrons have run their cameras in would undermine that, leaving patrons to agonize over whether or not to write-off their 1D funding and change to a mirrorless equal.

I do know I am studying quite a bit into the selection of battery Canon has made for the R3, however I ponder whether the LP-E19 is getting used in order that photographers utilizing the brand new digicam side-by-side with EOS 1D X cameras will not must fiddle with a number of chargers.

The argument towards this concept is that Canon does not exist in a bubble. Canon is more likely to be keenly conscious of what Sony and Nikon are doing, so would it not dare threat under-selling its mirrorless capabilities by down-branding a digicam, simply to guard gross sales of an older mannequin?

Principle #2: The R3 is the quick digicam, the R1 can be high-res

The second risk is that the R1 can be a high-resolution mannequin, to the R3’s high-speed one. This could match with Canon’s former method, by which it provided a full-frame 1Ds mannequin for professionals needing excessive decision and a high-speed APS-H 1D mannequin for sports activities. These appeared to merge with the EOS 1D X, which provided comparatively excessive decision, excessive velocity and a full-frame sensor, however maybe Canon has determined a two-camera technique makes extra sense, in an period the place the definition of ‘high-res’ is being pushed a lot larger than quick cameras can match.

Sony’s a1 affords an unprecedented mixture of velocity and determination, however nonetheless does not come near the comparably priced GFX 100S for photographers needing most element

Principle #3: The R3 would possibly look good however an ‘R1’ would must be excellent

The third risk, then, is solely that Canon does not wish to use its ‘1 sequence’ designation for a mirrorless digicam till it could possibly unarguably out-perform the EOS-1D cameras in each regard. All of the specs launched to this point recommend the R3 must be a match for the EOS-1D X Mark III, however the final check of that can be whether or not skilled 1D X customers discover they will work with and rely upon the R3 to the identical diploma. Given Canon’s historic reticence to over-claim what its cameras are able to, this appears believable to me (and the no-doubt bruising expertise surrounding the R5 and R6’s video capabilities could nicely have left the corporate erring on the aspect of warning).

Finally, it is inconceivable to make sure, based mostly on what Canon has publicly stated. We’re hoping the EOS R3 is launched quickly, so we will discover out for ourselves, however with the rescheduled 2020 2021 Tokyo Olympics simply over a month away, it appears possible that the digicam can be put to the check quickly sufficient. Perhaps then we’ll start to see what, if something, separates it from a 1-series digicam.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart