As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from

ZTE Axon 30 Extremely assessment: Ticking off all the proper bins is insufficient

The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely was meant to go up head-to-head towards the Android-powered flagships from Samsung, Xiaomi, and Oppo whereas ensuring it stays pocket-friendly by way of pricing. ZTE definitely didn’t skimp on the {hardware}, providing a 144Hz refresh price show, a Snapdragon 888 SoC, and even a quad 64MP digicam module – however are these sufficient to think about this as a premium smartphone? The reply lies in my full assessment.


  • 144Hz AMOLED show
  • Highly effective Snapdragon 888 chipset
  • Telephoto lens with 5x optical zoom
  • Stable battery life
  • Comparatively inexpensive worth


  • Unreliable picture processing
  • Quick charging is a bit gradual
  • Overheating when gaming intensively
  • No IP certification
  • No wi-fi charging assist

ZTE Axon 30 Extremely in a nutshell

The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely is obtainable since Could 27, 2021, and arrived in two configurations of 8/128 GB and 12/256 GB, retailing for $749 and $849, respectively.

Regardless of its worth, it was positioned as a premium flagship in a market phase that may be thought-about because the very pinnacle. Sure, I discussed “regardless of” its worth, although it’s nonetheless costly for many customers. However whenever you evaluate it towards the $1,250 charged for the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, or the $1,150 sticker worth of the Oppo Find X3 Pro, or the $1,200 asking worth for the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, ZTE’s worth appears to be much more cheap directly.

Mainly, the smartphone claims to supply the {hardware} specs and person expertise of an extremely flagship for the worth of a fundamental flagship mannequin. Clearly, the promise sounds too good to be true. Regardless of a specs sheet that ticks all the proper bins in 2021, the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely nonetheless needed to accept a number of essential compromises.

Nonetheless, regardless of doing so and having a historical past of sporadic software program updates, I can perceive that this mixture for a flagship, while imperfect, primarily focuses on the {hardware}/worth ratio to be able to catch your consideration, particularly when it dips beneath the $800 mark.

Design and display: A Samsung Galaxy Word 20 Extremely with a moustache

The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely shares a detailed resemblance with the
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, sporting a really comparable 
design language with a powerful deal with display high quality – at the very least with regards to the specs. An AMOLED show with a 144Hz refresh price, a 300Hz tactile sampling price, curved edges, a Gorilla Glass 5 again – all the required goodies are a part of the deal. 

I preferred the:

  • 144 Hz refresh price.
  • 300 Hz contact sampling price.
  • Elegant design.
  • Distinctive again coating that limits fingerprints.

I did not just like the:

  • Lack of IP certification.
  • Energy button may very well be extra responsive.
  • Common display brightness.
  • Lack of a 3.5 mm jack.
NextPit ZTE Axon 30 Ultra display
No, this isn’t a Samsung Galaxy Word 20 Extremely / © NextPit

I am not going to rant on and on for the subsequent three hours about this, however if you wish to see it to consider it how carefully comparable the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely is to the Samsung Galaxy Word 20 Extremely, then I wish to invite you to look at MKBHD’s assessment on YouTube.

Sure, we do discover the very same design comprising all the proper angles and flats, along with the subtly curved 2.5D edges. I have no idea whether or not this is a matter with its ending or a deliberate design selection, however alongside the way in which, I discovered the aluminum body to be raised, interrupting the curved show – which implies it’s not all that snug to the touch. 

NextPit ZTE Axon 30 Ultra side
The curved display, whereas unpopular, stays a particular function of high-end Android smartphones / © NextPit

On the again, the digicam module is completely monstrous in dimension since we’re speaking about an “extremely” flagship with 4 lenses organized in a big, rectangular island with a really skinny fin (which I believe capabilities as a spacer), the place you discover the phrases “Neovision Images” printed. The matte coating on the again may be very good, guaranteeing that this doesn’t flip right into a fingerprint magnet.

Let’s return to the entrance of the smartphone, discovering a 6.67-inch Full HD+ AMOLED show with a 1080 x 2400 pixels decision along with a pixel density of 395 dpi. Nothing too spectacular right here, other than the show sporting an adaptive 144Hz refresh price and a 300Hz contact sampling price.

NextPit ZTE Axon 30 Ultra front camera
Samsung’s shows even have a much less notable chin and brow / © NextPit

As at all times, Android 11’s FPS counter (which might be enabled through developer choices) reveals that you simply hardly ever hit 144 FPS outdoors of Twitter and chosen sport titles. More often than not, I used to be restricted to 120 FPS for searching and 60 Hz when streaming movies or music.

The brightness appeared to be fairly common, the place the display remained seen and principally legible even once I was open air making an attempt out its digicam beneath the recent afternoon solar, however I’ve undoubtedly seen and skilled higher.

NextPit ZTE Axon 30 Ultra usb
No 3.5 mm jack or IP certification on the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely / © NextPit

Total, the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely feels a bit prefer it’s been dressed up because the Galaxy Word 20 Extremely. Design-wise, I discover the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely’s seems to be convincing. The display additionally capabilities nicely and reinforces the impression of holding a premium product in your arms.

Person interface: MyOS 11 must be refined

The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely runs on
Android 11 with its very personal pores and skin often called MyOS 11 which is kind of far cry from the inventory Android expertise, requiring a lot refinement in my view. 

Normally, I don’t spend an excessive amount of time on a smartphone’s person interface since I’ve already devoted a full assessment to them as is the case with OxygenOS 11 or MIUI, or as a result of I’ve already mentioned it intimately in a unique smartphone assessment. The entire thought is to keep away from redundancy and pointless repetition, however that is the very first time the place I’m utilizing a MyOS-powered handset, and the expertise was slightly complicated. Right here is my temporary opinion about it. 

To place it merely, it just about follows the identical philosophy as different Android skins from Chinese language producers, i.e. an interface that is visually removed from the clear inventory Android expertise with a extra cluttered look. Visually, we are able to say that MyOS stays true to this custom with its massive coloured quantity sliders in addition to humongous widgets within the fast menu.

zte axon 30 ultra review ui
Aside from the look, MyOS 11 stays near inventory Android by way of options / © NextPit

Nonetheless, by way of options, it is easy to navigate to the place you need to go. There aren’t 10 billion customization choices or tons of bloatware and pre-installed purposes to wade via (aside from Google apps, a browser, and a local file supervisor).

However we do really feel that this pores and skin nonetheless lacks maturity. I skilled show bugs with sure apps, particularly with Twitter the place my wallpaper would seem clear every time I reloaded my information feed. Generally, the contact display would change into unresponsive once I accessed the app drawer.

Presently, the smartphone has obtained the Could 2021 safety patch, however we should not such updates to be common. The ZTE Axon 20 5G which was launched final 12 months nonetheless hasn’t obtained Android 11 in response to what I do know. Nonetheless, ZTE has assured that the Android 12 replace could be arriving in 2022 for the Axon 30 Extremely.

Personally, ZTE’s MyOS interface hasn’t significantly dented my person expertise. Sure, the overlay is visually funky however all of Android 11’s options are there. That is clearly not the smartphone’s strongest swimsuit, but it surely’s principally the producer’s observe report with updates that worries me.

Efficiency: Snapdragon 888 SoC stays the chipset to beat

The ZTE is powered by a Snapdragon 888 SoC, much like all the different Android flagships that have been launched because the starting of this 12 months, therefore it doesn’t veer too far-off from the imply by way of efficiency.

It’s unsurprising then to see its benchmark outcomes. Simply as I’d not increase any eyebrows when pushing this processor to the hilt in benchmarks solely to be met with overheating points and thermal throttling.

ZTE Axon 30 Extremely

Graphics benchmarks
Benchmarks ZTE Axon 30 Extremely Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely OnePlus 9 Professional Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely
3D Mark Wild Life 5808 5621 5670 7373
3D Mark Wild Life Stress Check Failed, overheated Failed, overheated


Geekbench 5 (Single / Multi) 1124/3582 1123/3619


942 / 3407

PassMark Reminiscence

31.347 30.460



PassMark disk

92.550 115.473



I subjected the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely to the basic battery of graphics assessments that I have been utilizing for months. Amongst them, 3DMark’s Wild Life Stress Check simulates intensive and extended gaming use for 20 minutes. Sadly, I may by no means arrive on the finish of this benchmark as a result of the smartphone stored closing the applying after 5 minutes whereas being scorching to the contact.

In actuality, gaming periods for me are usually restricted to half-hour to an hour on Name of Obligation Cellular with its graphics cranked all the way in which to the utmost, enabling all graphics choices whereas setting the body price at its highest degree. Doing so, I didn’t expertise any dropped frames in any respect, which is an efficient factor. 

Total, the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely is not any higher or worse than some other Snapdragon 888-powered Android flagship. However Qualcomm in addition to smartphone producers actually need to work on this overheating difficulty for 2022.

Digicam efficiency: Trio of 64 MP lenses and a periscope telephoto lens

The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely 5G incorporates a quad-64 MP digicam configuration with a slightly unusual mixture of sensors from a {hardware} perspective.

ZTE Axon 30 Extremely

Digicam specs
Lens Specs
Predominant wide-angle Sony IMX686 64 MP f/1.6 aperture / 26 mm / sensor dimension 1/1.72″, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS
Extremely wide-angle Samsung GW3 64 MP f/2.2 aperture / 13 mm / 120˚ FOV / 1/1.97″ sensor dimension
Portrait lens Samsung GW3 64 MP f/1.9 aperture / 35 mm / 1/1.97″ sensor dimension / PDAF
8 MP telephoto lens f/3.4 aperture / 123 mm / 1/4.0″ dimension, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom

I preferred the:

  • Versatile digicam setup.
  • Devoted telephoto lens with 5x zoom.
  • Convincing extremely wide-angle lens efficiency.

I did not just like the:

  • Ineffective 60x zoom restrict.
  • Common evening mode efficiency.
  • Lower than passable picture processing.
  • Why a 64 MP portrait lens?
NextPit ZTE Axon 30 Ultra camera
The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely’s digicam module is not your typical configuration to say the least / © NextPit

ZTE Axon 30 Extremely wide-angle and ultra-wide angle photographs

The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely’s foremost digicam sensor is a Sony IMX686 that captures 16MP pictures by default, providing pixel-binning of 4. It is a basic module that can also be discovered on the Nubia RedMagic 6 (a subsidiary of ZTE) or the Asus ROG Phone 5.

Through the day, it performs nicely. Whereas it’s clearly not on the degree of the Galaxy S21 Ultra or a Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra which carries bigger sensors in addition to a better 108 MP decision. The extent of element is nice, with none smoothing on the horizon and pleasing colorimetry, though I are likely to desire saturated colours greater than the common reviewer and finish person.

zte axon 30 ultra review photo wide3
Extremely wide-angle lens vs. wide-angle prime lens / © NextPit
zte axon 30 ultra review photo wide2
Extremely wide-angle lens vs. wide-angle prime lens / © NextPit

With the extremely wide-angle lens, the element degree stays passable though the lens allows rather less mild than in wide-angle since we lose out within the aperture in addition to the sensor’s bodily dimension.

I didn’t discover any distortion on the edges of the picture regardless of a really respectable FOV of 120°. Logically, there are some colour inconsistencies and particularly by way of publicity (see the water beneath which is far duller in extremely wide-angle than with the primary sensor).

zte axon 30 ultra review photo wide4
Word the much less saturated but additionally hotter colours in extremely wide-angle pictures / © NextPit
zte axon 30 ultra review photo wide1 1
White steadiness is certainly hotter, too heat the truth is, in extremely wide-angle / © NextPit

ZTE Axon 30 Extremely zoom photographs

Relating to zoom efficiency, the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely incorporates a devoted 8MP periscope telephoto lens that’s able to as much as 5x optical zoom with a focal size equal of 123mm. The picture app affords default magnifications of 2x, 5x, and 60x.

In 2x, the telephoto lens doesn’t are available in, however slightly, it’s the third 64MP lens that sees motion, in any other case often called the “portrait lens”. The result’s respectable sufficient, however we did understand a level of digital smoothing to masks the artifacts when upscaling the picture. As for the remainder of its outcomes, the dynamic vary and colorimetry are fairly correct.

Past 2x zoom, it is the periscope telephoto lens that comes into play. I actually anticipated myself to be disillusioned, particularly after Xiaomi and Samsung’s zoom efficiency. On the finish, the outcomes have been slightly respectable at 5x and even 10x, though we discover the identical digital smoothing considerations that resulted in some lack of sharpness and element.

zte axon 30 ultra review photo zoom6
From left to proper: 2x zoom with 64 MP portrait, 5x and 10x zoom with the 8 MP periscope lens / © NextPit
zte axon 30 ultra review photo zoom4
The feel of this statue at 10x is approach too easy / © NextPit
zte axon 30 ultra review photo zoom5
Right here, the translucent white haze attributable to digital smoothing is clearly seen / © NextPit

I additionally had enjoyable taking photos at 60x zoom, which is the theoretical most that depends purely on digital magnification. Not surprisingly, the outcomes are completely unusable and this operate is nothing greater than a gimmick. It is a disgrace because the telephoto lens has optical stabilization (OIS), however focusing isn’t as simple as with a Galaxy S21 Extremely or a Mi 11 Extremely the place the picture app guides you with a preview of the zoomed topic, amongst others.

zte axon 30 ultra review photo zoom2
Effectively, I have to admit that even with an ideal zoom lens, this image could be onerous to make use of due to my poor framing and composition / © NextPit
zte axon 30 ultra review photo zoom1
Hey, do you see my pixels? Spectacular! Superb! / © NextPit
zte axon 30 ultra review photo zoom3
Producers should cease with the 50x zoom and above gimmick / © NextPit

ZTE Axon 30 Extremely evening pictures

The evening mode of the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely works with all lenses besides the telephoto lens. This lets you take evening photographs at 1x with the primary wide-angle lens, 0.5x with the extremely wide-angle, and 2x with the portrait lens.

The rendering may be very common total, even in correctly lit evening environments, with the scene nonetheless trying underexposed with very restricted dynamic vary. Digital smoothing is as soon as once more all too current.

zte axon 30 ultra review photo night
The evening mode of the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely is barely actually usable in 1x wide-angle / © NextPit

Total, the digicam module isn’t on par with an Android flagship that retails for greater than €1,000. I don’t perceive the aim of the portrait lens’ existence. However the outcomes are nonetheless worthy of a high-end Android smartphone in my view, like a Xiaomi Mi 11, a Galaxy S21 or a OnePlus 9, with the extra telephoto lens at an inexpensive worth. Feels like a candy deal to me!

Stable battery life with a much less spectacular quick cost

The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely is powered by a 4,600 mAh battery that helps 65 watts of quick charging (Fast Cost 4+ and USB PD 3.0) when plugged in. It even comes with a charger within the field!

I preferred the:

  • Included 65W charger.
  • Stable battery life efficiency.

I did not just like the:

  • Quick wired charging is slower in comparison with its competitors.
  • Lack of wi-fi charging.

Aside from my display take a look at, I spent virtually all of my time on the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely with the display refresh price locked in at 144 Hz with out adaptive price enabled. On an intense day of use accompanied by a photo-taking session of an hour and a half lengthy, adopted by a whole hour of graphics benchmarks, I emptied the battery after 12 hours.

For a extra sensible expertise, I averaged virtually two full days with 6-7 hours of display time per day earlier than the handset fell beneath the 20% remaining battery life mark. To place it merely, a “regular” utilization sample and 6 hours of display time per day would require you to hit the closest energy outlet after a day and a half, or maybe longer than that.

The 65 watt quick cost is quick, with my greatest 0-100% rating being 42 minutes. That is nonetheless barely beneath what Xiaomi, Oppo, or OnePlus provide, however it’s vastly superior to Samsung’s figures with its poor 25 watts (what extra with a 5,000 mAh battery on the S21 Extremely).

The ZTE Axon 30 Extremely’s battery life is correct up there with what you’d anticipate from a high-end smartphone with a sub-5,000 mAh battery. The display clearly consumes essentially the most power, and I do assume that its quick charging may have been a bit quicker.

{Hardware} specs

ZTE Axon 30 Extremely

Technical specs
Elements Specs
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
  • 8/128 GB
  • 12/256 GB
  • UFS 3.1
Expandable storage No
Display screen
  • 6.67-inch AMOLED
  • Full HD+ 1080 x 2400, or 395 dpi
  • 144 Hz refresh price
  • 300 Hz contact sampling price
Digicam module
  • Predominant wide-angle Sony IMX686 64 MP: f/1.6 aperture / 26 mm / 1/1.72″ sensor dimension, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS
  • Extremely wide-angle Samsung GW3 64 MP: f/2.2 aperture / 13 mm / 120˚ FOV / sensor dimension 1/1.97″
  • Portrait Samsung GW3 64 MP: f/1.9 aperture / 35 mm / 1/1.97″ sensor dimension / PDAF
  • 8 MP telephoto lens: f/3.4 aperture / 123 mm / 1/4.0″ dimension, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
  • 16 MP selfie
  • 8K at 30 FPS
  • 4K at 30/60 FPS
  • 1080p at 30/60 FPS
  • 4600 mAh
  • 65W wired quick cost
  • Charger included
  • No wi-fi charging
OS MyOS 11 primarily based on Android 11
Connectivity Wi-Fi 6E / Bluetooth 5.2 / NFC / LTE / 5G / Twin SIM / Twin nano SIM
IP Certification None
Dimensions & Weight
Value $749 / $849


If I needed to sum up the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely, I might say it is a hodgepodge of {hardware} specs and scorching buzzwords of the day, ticking off all the proper bins within the specs sheet for a high-end flagship machine that carefully resembles the Samsung Galaxy Word 20 Extremely.

Theoretically, it would appear to be slightly logical to position the ZTE Axon 30 Extremely on par with the Samsung Galaxy S21 Extremely or Xiaomi Mi 11 Extremely. In spite of everything, it’s a premium Android flagship with all of the bells and whistles that you’ve come to anticipate, so what is the huge deal?

A 144Hz AMOLED display? Examine. The Snapdragon 888 chipset? Examine. 65-watt quick charging? Examine. Quad-camera module with a telephoto lens? Examine.

However upon taking a better take a look at the software program processing functionality with regards to photographs, stability of the person interface or the dearth of IP certification reminds us that this dreamboat does make some sacrifices to fulfill the extra inexpensive worth. 

The general person expertise merely lacks polish, little question about that, however we nonetheless find yourself with a smartphone that provides a reasonably full expertise total. Sadly, there may be nonetheless room for enchancment, however virtually all the essential elements are already there. 

In conclusion, I will solely suggest anybody shopping for this smartphone if its producer makes agency and clear commitments with regards to Android safety updates sooner or later. As well as, I will solely suggest it to customers who worth {hardware}/worth above all else versus a easy person expertise.


We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart